I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
"I hope my post brings awareness to the skiing community to ski with a friend," Schmidt said. "You never know where you're going to be."。关于这个话题，WPS下载最新地址提供了深入分析
Цены на нефть взлетели до максимума за полгода17:55。关于这个话题，快连下载-Letsvpn下载提供了深入分析
Москвичи пожаловались на зловонную квартиру-свалку с телами животных и тараканами18:04
Англия — Премьер-лига|28-й тур